Wiki / Forks / Bitcoin ALL (BTA)

Bitcoin ALL (BTA)BTA

From the Bitcoin Takeover Wiki · ✓ 4 sources · 0 podcast anchors · built 2026-11-13

Planned as a snapshot airdrop; no chain or code was found. Kept off the lineage map.

A Chinese-language December 2017 project (比特币荣耀) planning snapshots at block 498,960 and on 1 January 2018, AuxPoW mining and user voting; no source code was found.

◆ Takeover vieweditorial · opinion, labelled

The wiki's angle: Bitcoin ALL planned two snapshots and promised to unfreeze each holder's coins by the smaller of the two balances.[1]

Contents

  1. Plan
  2. Record
  3. References

Plan

The archived Chinese site, captured on 27 March 2018, lays out a roadmap: a first snapshot at block height 498960 around 13 December 2017, and a second at timestamp 1514736000 on 1 January 2018, which it maps to block 501906[1]. Block 498,960 was mined on 12 December 2017[2]. Holders would get BTA 1:1 against their BTC balance, frozen at first and released according to the smaller of the two snapshots[1]. The site promises AuxPoW mining, zero premine and a transaction-voting scheme it calls PoTX[1].

Record

The 2019 fork list gives a fork at 498960, notes the site is “only in Chinese”, and says “no source code available”[3]. forkdrop's data file lists fork block and date as N/A and marks the coin not live[4]. Whether a chain ever ran is unknown[4].

References

  1. primaryBitcoin ALL (比特币荣耀) website, bitcoinall.org (Chinese; Wayback Machine copy, 27 Mar 2018)
  2. primarymempool.space, Bitcoin block 498,960 (header time 2017-12-12 21:39:19 UTC) [archived]
  3. secondary“My list of 43(+3) reviewed Bitcoin forks”, Bitcointalk topic 2777849 (last update 26 Feb 2019) [archived]
  4. secondaryforkdrop.io data file json/index.json, the per-coin table behind its fork pages (Wayback Machine copy, 13 Jan 2021)

Related

Merged mining
Reusing the same proof of work on a parent chain and one or more auxiliary chains, pioneered by Namecoin with
Source note: the 2019 fork list (johnsmithx)
The Bitcointalk list of 43 reviewed Bitcoin forks that this wiki cites as bth-review: who wrote it, how it tes
Snapshot forks vs chain splits
Why some “forks” share Bitcoin's history and others only copy its balances, and why it matters for claiming co
Categories: Forks · Fork lineage
Ask about this article: >_ terminal · Onion mirror: http://btctkvroa6xsq25wmpvvlpkcgss7724zk6fm765fvtuunfgxw74j2pyd.onion/wiki/bitcoin-all/
>_ ask the wiki